Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- fr:programme [2015/05/12 06:14]
nkubler [Conférenciers invités]
+++ fr:programme [2021/11/30 02:09] (Version actuelle)
@@ Ligne 2: / Ligne 2: @@
-Vous pouvez télécharger le programme ici {{:fr:trela_programme.compressed.pdf|}}
+Vous pouvez télécharger le programme ici {{:fr:prgramme_trela_30juin.pdf|}}
-===== Conférenciers invités =====
+===== Conférences plénières =====
-**Professor Claire KRAMSCH**
-Presentation
+======Claire KRAMSCH======
-APPLIED LINGUISTICS: A THEORY OF THE PRACTICE
+**Professor of German and Affiliate Professor of Education
+at the University of California at Berkeley**
-Claire Kramsch, UC Berkeley
+**APPLIED LINGUISTICS: A THEORY OF THE PRACTICE**
@@ Ligne 49: / Ligne 50: @@
 multicultural Applied Linguistics.
-Biographie
-Claire KRAMSCH is Professor of German and Affiliate Professor of Education
+======Guy ASTON======
-at the University of California at Berkeley. She has published extensively
-on language and culture in language learning and teaching, on globalization
+**Alma Mater Professor of English Linguistics, University of Bologna**
-and multilingualism. She is the author of *Context and Culture in Language
-Teaching* (OUP 1993), *Language and Culture* (OUP 1997), *The Multilingual
+**CORPORA ARE USEFUL TOOLS FOR TRANSLATORS: AND FOR INTERPRETERS?**
-Subject* (OUP 2009) and  with Ulrike Jessner of *The Multilingual Challenge*
-(Mouton de Gruyter in press). She is the past president of AAAL and
+The differences between translation and interpreting (be the latter simultaneous, consecutive, or dialogue) would appear to exclude from an interpreting context many of the uses of corpora proposed for translation (Kubler & Aston 2010). Interpreters need to understand and produce appropriate speech, not writing. They have limited time in which to translate, and hence little chance to consult reference materials when faced with problems. And they have virtually no possibility to revise their output. In such conditions, what use can corpora possibly be?
-coeditor of *Applied Linguistics.* She is the editor of *L2Journal* and
-co-editor (with Zhu Hua) of the Routledge book series *Language and
+In the absence of significant developments in speech recognition and machine translation, the main value of corpora for interpreters would seem to lie in the areas of preparation and training. Corpora can help interpreters, like translators, to become familiar with genres, topics, and terminology they are likely to have to face. This is particularly the case where a corpus contains transcripts which are aligned with audio/video, enabling the user to hear as well as view occurrences, and hence verify and compare their prosodic as well as their lexicogrammatical characteristics (Aston 2015). But there are arguably other potential uses of corpora for the trainee interpreter. If we consider Gile's metaphor of the interpreter as a tightrope walker, trying to maintain a balance between the various efforts of comprehension, memorisation, production, and coordination (Gile 1999), it seems legitimate to ask how such efforts may be effectively reduced. A wide variety of work on other kinds of stressful speech management  suggests that a key role may be played by the use of formulae, which can enhance reliance on memory rather than processing (Bolinger 1976). Developing a more extensive formulaic repertoire may facilitate comprehension on the one hand, and production on the other; the analysis by trainees of formulaic uses (n-grams, concgrams) and their prosodies in corpora of interpreting input and output may thus facilitate the acquisition of the phraseological competence necessary to achieve more fluent interpreting performance.
-Intercultural Communication*, and (with Ulrike Jessner) of the Mouton book
-series *Trends in Applied Linguistics*. She is the current President of
+Aston, G. 2015. Learning phraseology from speech corpora. In A. Lenko-Szymanska and A. Boulton (eds), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 65-84.
-AILA.
+Bolinger, D. 1976. Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.
+Gile, D. 1999. Testing the Effort Models' tightrope hypothesis in simultaneous interpreting - a contribution. Hermes 23: 153-172.
+Kubler, N. & G. Aston 2010. Using corpora in translation. In A. O'Keefe & M. McCarthy (eds), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London: Routledge. 501-515.
+======Marie-Françoise NARCY-COMBES======
+**Professeur émérite en didactique des langues, Université de Nantes**
+**TERRAINS DE RECHERCHE ET RESISTANCES SOCIOPOLITIQUES / REALITS ET PROBLEMES$**
+Au delà du savoir et des théories en linguistique appliquée l'intervention sur le terrain se heurte le plus souvent à des résistances d'ordre politique, économique et socioculturel, qui exigent de la part du chercheur une vigilance de tous les instants pour proposer des dispositifs et des adaptations qui en tiennent compte sans renoncer à la rigueur scientifique et à la déontologie professionnelle;
+Après plus de quinze ans de participation et d'observations d'interventions sur le terrain qui serviront de corpus pour une méta-analyse, nous proposons de dresser un bilan dans lequel seront pris en compte d'une part les positionnements épistémologiques théoriques qui guident l'intervention (complexité et émergentisme, approche par les tâches et socioconstructivisme), et d'autre part les résistances contextuelles qui influencent la mise en œuvre des dispositifs.
+Nous conclurons en proposant des pistes d'action pour l'avenir qui amènent à élargir le champ de la linguistique appliquée.

Outils pour utilisateurs

Différences

Outils de la page

Outils du site